DON26BZ01-NV016ActiveSBIR

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Department of DefenseNAVY

AI Overview

The Navy seeks superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) technology to rapidly store and discharge power for pulsed weapons systems aboard all-electric ships. This high-rate intermittent storage prevents electrical grid disruption and generator damage while supporting emerging naval combat loads.

This summary is AI-generated from the official solicitation.

Key Details

Agency
Department of Defense
Funding Amount
Release Date
March 2, 2026
Due Date
June 3, 2026

Official Description

A Navy ship’s electric plant and the electrical load aboard the vessel mimics an electrical microgrid structure to distribute power. Conventional plant designs have separate mechanical propulsion and weapons systems with the electrical plant to support hotel and combat systems. Future all-electric naval ships will require all prime movers to have the functionality of distributed electrical generators to power a wide variety of loads ranging from conventional electronics, electric propulsion syst...

Change History

Q&A UpdatedMay 21, 2026 at 6:02 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

All five Q&As received answers. Key clarifications: Pulse shape is a series of pulses; 20% duty cycle balance is recovery time (not hold time); power cycle duration is fixed; input power is 480VAC, 3-phase, 60Hz; SMES storage is mandatory—alternative storage solutions are not acceptable.

Q&A UpdatedMay 15, 2026 at 7:38 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Added 4 new technical clarification questions on pulse shape/profile, duty cycle composition, cycle duration variability, and input power system electrical characteristics. Reconfirmed that alternative energy storage solutions to SMES are not acceptable for this topic.

Q&A UpdatedMay 14, 2026 at 7:39 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Q1 received a definitive answer: Alternative energy storage solutions (other than SMES) are NOT acceptable for this topic, even if they offer better value propositions.

Q&A UpdatedMay 14, 2026 at 3:00 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

# Summary This Q&A addresses whether alternative energy storage solutions (beyond SMES) are acceptable for a pulsed power application requiring sub-1 second charging from MW sources, provided they offer better value.

Status ChangedMay 6, 2026 at 1:47 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Status changed from Pre-Release to Open

Date ChangedApr 14, 2026 at 3:03 AM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Close Date changed from 2026-04-22 to 2026-06-03

Date ChangedApr 14, 2026 at 3:03 AM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Open Date changed from 2026-03-25 to 2026-05-06

Status ChangedApr 14, 2026 at 3:03 AM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Status changed from Removed to Pre-Release

Opportunity RemovedMar 3, 2026 at 4:25 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Opportunity DON26BZ01-NV016 no longer available

Opportunity AddedMar 2, 2026 at 11:14 PM

Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

New opportunity: Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) Power Interfaces

Get Alerts for Opportunities Like This

RallyProp monitors thousands of funding sources and sends instant alerts when opportunities match your technology and capabilities.

Start Free Trial